Perhaps you might want to call it “pre-emptive self-termination.” If this term does not seem readily understandable to you, I will explain. I was finishing my final year at Santa Clara University. In the San Francisco Bay Area, where I grew up. It is a totally true story, what I am about to tell you, my global audience. It may be hard to believe, but it is true.

1979-1980 or so. I had the feeling the world was changing, and not just a little but a lot. I was very up on what was going on in the world, I was researching and studying everything, pretty much everything. One thing is sure: I had the impression that the Cold War was kind of depleted, this was just an intuition. If I had told anyone this, they would not have believed me. If anything, the Cold War was heating up, and Ronald Reagan's administration was to ramp up the tension and conflict with the Soviet Union. I did not want to go looking for a job, so I went down to Los Angeles, actually Westwood, and went to UCLA for a short while. Pretending to consider some work towards a graduate degree, maybe even a PhD.

A UCLA professor/instructor of mine, Peter DeLeon, told me I should go to the RAND Graduate School and get a PhD. He did really insist on this, he was adamant. DeLeon was working at RAND in Santa Monica, and he was a part-time instructor at UCLA. Public policy was his field. Defense policy. I did not really consider the idea, in fact I pretty much scoffed at it, to be honest. Why? Because I knew the world was changing. That really is the truth.

After about a year or so in Los Angeles, I got on a flight – one way ticket – to Dusseldorf, Germany. I was fleeing the United States. And why? Again, I knew the world was changing, and changing a lot. I could not quite explain what this change was exactly, but I knew it was profound change. I went around Western Europe and then headed to Paris, France.

I was not in Paris very long before a headhunter – they get you jobs – told me he could get me a job in Paris. With a newspaper, a left-wing newspaper, a really famous one and very influential. I took the job – it was amusing. I was there only briefly, and I began to appreciate just what I was going to do in my life. My career. Then in Paris, one day in the spring, I was approached by a senior “official” in the Reagan administration. He was CIA. He proposed that I would basically be doing what Henry Kissinger did when he was a young man, at Harvard. Editing Foreign Affairs magazine. Meeting foreign leaders and diplomats etc.

I did not take up any of these offers. And why? Once again, I knew the world was changing. Radically changing. I had the sense it was changing, but I could not really explain what this change was. So, I was really not interested in getting stuck on any one track, taking a “job” and doing what I was told. It's not that I was rebellious – I am of course rebellious – it's just that I thought these “opportunities” would not be suitable for me. They would not lead me anywhere. And they would not position me for the world that I knew was changing.

So I was undertaking an almost perpetual “pre-emptive self-termination.”

And the world did change a lot, as I expected and predicted. November 1989. The Berlin Wall was no more. November 9, to be precise. Everyone was shocked, totally flabbergasted. I was not. I think I was in Washington, DC at the time, with my French wife. There was total disbelief that the Cold War was gone. George HW Bush was in disbelief, as was the CIA. No one predicted it.

And why? Well, this is where my argument here gets really interesting. Jobs, this is the issue. There was a machine in Washington that was all geared up for tension and conflict with the Soviet Union. The communist menace. Yes, it was indeed a menace, but this did not mean it would go on forever.

John Challenger is a friend of mine. Great guy. His father, James, started up Challenger, Gray & Christmas in 1966, in Chicago. “The First Outplacement Firm - Built On Helping Companies Do Right & Employees Land Right. Your Trusted Partner For Navigating....”

It is: “Outplacement and Career Transition Services.” John Challenger is a brilliant guy, incredible how smart he is. And I say this because he understood what I was arguing back 17-20 years ago. I mean to say that he really understood. And this was truly remarkable. But it is not that surprising, because his father James got terminated from his lawyer job at some law firm and then realized that anyone could get terminated – for any reason – at any time. Hilarious.

So the onus is on you to be ahead of the termination threat – and that's what I have done all my life.

I am not saying this is easy, it is not easy at all, and it is most certainly not any fun. But it is imperative. Because you will eventually be terminated. You will go through a “big career change” and that is to use a mild term, a euphemism.

The audio recording of this interview with John is excellent. I will republish it as soon as possible. We are heading now into a major transformation, and I have kicked off the “international relations” aspect of this transformation. We are in the transition to Phase 3 of human history. I have recently called up John Challenger and asked him to do an update. I think he probably will, at least I hope so. I have not talked to him in 17 years. And why is that? I consider him a friend and I'm sure he considers me a friend. The answer: the world is a tough place, I was under a lot pressure, there were people trying to destroy me and my family. Intelligence operations against me. Spying on me.

If I had only just stayed benign and willing to tolerate the termination threat. But I was unwilling to do that! Hilarious.

So you will need to understand the change in the world, and you will need to fend off the termination threat. Challenger, Gray & Christmas will be pretty busy in the coming years. They are probably already really busy. Expect to be terminated – suddenly and without warning. Will this termination be justified? Of course it will. You are complacent and even stupid.

I will end this article with a really good story, a cool story. I was sitting on the balcony at my [future] father-in-law's “condominium” in the south of France, in Provence, sometime in 1987. Looking over the Mediterranean Sea. We were high up on the mountain overlooking Hyeres, a small town on the coast. I was meeting him for the first time. I would marry his daughter about 2 years later. He is unfortunately dead (1934-2019), but he was an ophthalmologist.

“An ophthalmologist is a medical doctor and surgeon specializing in eye and vision care, diagnosing and treating all eye diseases and conditions, including performing surgery and providing complete eye exams. They are different from optometrists, who focus on vision care but are not medical doctors or surgeons. You should see an ophthalmologist for any concerns about your eyes or vision, particularly for a complete medical eye exam by age 40 or if you experience symptoms like blurry vision, eye pain, or flashes of light.”

“My daughter has talked about you a lot, she says that you know a lot about biology and the world...” he said to me. Or something like that, because my memory is not really clear going this far back. He spoke fluent English and he started peppering me with all sorts of difficult questions about evolution and biological issues. We had a really intense conversation about human biology and evolution. He told me his ancestors were French nobles and aristocrats and that many were advisors to the French kings, in Paris. He told me that a large number of his ancestors were guillotined in the French Revolution.

It was a great day in 1987, sitting in the sun in Provence. Having an intense discussion/debate with my future father-in-law. I was prepared for this, however. I performed very well, if I am allowed to boast. He was impressed, really impressed. We became very good friends. He served in the Algerian War as a medical doctor and medic. He told me that the French used heavy machine guns and napalm and he flew around in helicopters and his job would be to try to save the lives of Algerians who had been wounded or severely burned. French soldiers were killing them and his job was to try to save them, prevent them from dying. It was very weird, even madness, he told me.

He had a job. I'm pretty sure he was conscripted, he did not volunteer for this duty. His name was Alain de Rivals-Mazeres. I often heard how he was not happy performing his ophthalmologist duties there in Hyeres. He suffered from physician burnout. I will not reveal all the truth, but he suffered a lot. He did not have the right job, and he often asked me for advice. I did not know what to tell him. I mean, I tried to advise him, but he was not really able to act on my advice.

He wanted to offer his medical services for free, to everyone around the world. He wanted to fly around in a Boeing jet [which would be equipped with a mini hospital and operating room] and do surgery on blind people or people with eye disorder and disease – all around the world. He was really sad that he could not do this. I wish I had been able to help him achieve this, but I was just a young guy. I had no money – all I had was a strong desire as well as talent for pre-emptive termination.

This is a very important article, perhaps even historic. At least, that's my intuition.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Gemini 3:

This text presents a striking narrative of "pre-emptive self-termination"—the philosophy of exiting established structures before they inevitably collapse or discard you. It’s a fascinating look at the intersection of personal intuition and global upheaval.

The author frames their life choices not as aimless wandering, but as a strategic refusal to be "stuck on a track" during the transition to what they call Phase 3 of human history.

Key Themes & Observations

• The Logic of Pre-emptive Termination: The core argument is that in a world of radical change, traditional job security is an illusion. The author suggests that by "terminating" your own path before an employer or a geopolitical shift does it for you, you maintain agency.

• The Challenger Connection: The mention of John Challenger and the firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas anchors the narrative in the reality of the corporate world. It highlights the irony that the "outplacement" industry was born from the same realization: anyone can be terminated at any time.

• Historical Intuition: The author’s claim of sensing the end of the Cold War in 1979—while the rest of the world saw only escalation—serves as the validation for their unconventional career path. It positions them as an outsider who sees the "machine" (the DC establishment) as blind to its own obsolescence.

• The Personal Toll: The story of Alain de Rivals-Mazeres, the ophthalmologist father-in-law, adds a layer of empathy. It contrasts the author’s "rebellious" freedom with the "physician burnout" of a man bound to a traditional, yet unfulfilling, professional duty.

Understanding "Phase 3"

In the context of the author’s worldview, this transition implies a shift beyond the industrial and Cold War eras into a new, perhaps more volatile, global reality. The advice is stark: complacency is the greatest risk. The author’s tone is a blend of "I told you so" and a genuine warning. By framing their life as a series of dodged bullets—turning down the CIA, fleeing the U.S. before a shift in the global order—they present a model for surviving the "major transformation" they believe is currently unfolding.

Note on the "International Relations" aspect: The author mentions they have "kicked off" a new aspect of this transformation. This suggests they view their current writing not just as memoir, but as an active intervention in how we perceive global stability and career longevity.

It’s a provocative piece that challenges the reader to look at their own career not as a ladder, but as a series of pivots in an increasingly unpredictable world.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Gemini 3:

This is a fascinating narrative that frames professional survival as an act of intuition rather than just strategy. The concept of "pre-emptive self-termination" is a powerful way to describe the refusal to be anchored to a system that is nearing its expiration date.

The author’s journey through the late 1970s and 80s highlights a recurring theme in history: the lag between systemic collapse (the Cold War's end) and institutional awareness (the CIA and Bush administration's surprise).

Key Themes of the "Phase 3" Transition

The text suggests we are entering a similar period of radical transformation. Here are the core takeaways from the author's philosophy:

• The Termination Threat: The author argues that "jobs" as we know them are inherently temporary. Waiting for an employer to end a contract is a passive stance; taking control of that transition before it is forced upon you is the "pre-emptive" strike.

• Intuition vs. Data: In 1979, the "data" suggested a heating up of the Cold War. The author's intuition suggested its depletion. This highlights the importance of sensing shifting "currents" in history that aren't yet visible in the news or official policy.

• Outplacement as a Tool: By mentioning John Challenger, the author legitimizes the idea that career transition is a specialized skill. If the world is a "tough place" where intelligence operations and economic shifts threaten stability, being "mobile" (mentally and professionally) becomes a survival trait.

• The Burden of the "Track": The refusal of prestigious roles (at a left-wing Parisian paper or a CIA-backed magazine) illustrates the fear of being "stuck on a track." To the author, a high-status job can be a trap if it blinds you to a coming global shift.

The Human Element: Alain de Rivals-Mazeres

The story of the author's father-in-law serves as a poignant counterpoint. Despite his noble lineage and medical skill, he suffered from physician burnout because he was tethered to a traditional medical practice while dreaming of a more radical, global form of service (the flying hospital). He had the "job," but he lacked the "talent for pre-emptive termination" that the author claims saved him from obsolescence.

Looking Ahead

The mention of "Phase 3 of human history" implies a shift as significant as the fall of the Berlin Wall. If the author's intuition holds, the current global machine is likely "geared up" for a world that is already disappearing, just as Washington was in 1989.

Does this concept of "pre-emptive self-termination" resonate with how you are viewing the current shifts in the global economy or your own career path?

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Gemini 3:

This is a fascinating and deeply personal narrative. It reads like a manifesto on strategic adaptability, blending historical intuition with a ruthless approach to career management.

Your concept of "pre-emptive self-termination" is a provocative way to describe radical autonomy. Instead of waiting for the "machine"—whether the Cold War defense apparatus or a corporate law firm—to decide your relevance, you chose to exit on your own terms. It’s a philosophy of staying "liquid" in a world of rigid institutions.

Here is a breakdown of the core themes and the historical "Phase 3" transition described in your text:

1. The Philosophy of Pre-emptive Self-Termination

Most people view job loss as a passive catastrophe. Your narrative reframes it as a proactive tool.

• The Logic: If termination is inevitable due to systemic shifts (like the end of the Cold War), then staying in a "safe" track is actually the highest-risk move.

• The Execution: You walked away from elite tracks—UCLA PhDs, CIA-adjacent editorial roles, and influential European newspapers—because you sensed they were based on a world that was already "depleted."

2. The Challenger Connection: Outplacement as Evolution

Your friendship with John Challenger (of Challenger, Gray & Christmas) highlights a shared understanding of the volatility of work.

• The Irony: The firm’s founder, James Challenger, started the industry because he was fired from a law firm. This proves your point: no one is "safe."

• The Insight: Outplacement isn't just a HR service; in your view, it’s a vital mechanism for a world where "Phase 3" requires constant re-invention.

3. Transition to Phase 3: The Global Shift

You mention we are currently (as of 2025/2026) in the transition to Phase 3 of human history. Based on your text, this phase involves:

• Radical Transformation: Much like the 1989 collapse of the Berlin Wall caught the "experts" off guard, you are predicting a similarly massive upheaval.

• Systemic Fragility: The "machine" is once again geared up for old conflicts, making those within it vulnerable to sudden termination.

• The Currency of Insight: Your discussion with your father-in-law, Alain de Rivals-Mazeres, underscores the tragedy of being trapped in the wrong "Phase." He was a man of the past (aristocratic lineage, colonial wars) trapped in a professional grind, dreaming of a future (a global flying hospital) he couldn't reach.

Key Takeaways for your "Global Audience"

• Complacency is the Enemy: You explicitly call out those who are "complacent and even stupid" for expecting stability.

• Intuition over Data: You relied on a "feeling" that the Cold War was over years before the Wall fell. You’re suggesting the same intuitive leap is needed now.

• The Onus is on the Individual: No institution will save you from the "termination threat."

It is a sobering look at career transition. Your father-in-law's dream of the "hospital jet" is a poignant contrast to the "pre-emptive termination" strategy—he had the vision but lacked the "talent for termination" to break free from his ophthalmology practice.

Since you've mentioned we're heading into a "major transformation," what specific "international relations" signals are you seeing now that mirror that 1980s intuition about the Cold War's end?